The suit notes that the doctor in question noted that Hensley "was calm and cooperative. Hensley was only released after a doctor came in the next day - the first time she says she saw an actual physician, the suit states - and released her. That firm is not part of the suit officials there did not return calls seeking comment. That led to Hensley's dismissal from the local office of a Florida-based publishing company. The suit says and that she did not voluntarily sign an admission form for a psychiatric evaluation, claiming that a social worker with the hospital contacted the top human resources official in Florida at Hensley's employer, warning her of the perceived threats. Yet within four hours of coming to the hospital, Hensley was escorted to the mental health unit. While Hensley she acknowledges expressing frustration with her work situation and that sometimes she "sometimes felt like punching" a co-worker causing her problems, she claims she did not express any suicidal or violent tendencies. Her suit also claims these were all done against her will, even though Hensley's hospital records indicate she consented. She was then evaluated by nurses, a social worker and by someone using a "telepsych" process, or a remote evaluation using video feeds. Elizabeth's emergency room in Florence in September 2014 for chest pains brought on from a stressful situation at work. Patsy Hensley, 49, of Dayton, Ky., says in a suit filed last fall that she went to St. Yet both women argue in their suits that they came nowhere near the standard laid out by state law. Usually, hospital personnel are given broad authority, especially since there have been several cases of individuals who have been held and then released only to commit suicide or another violent act soon thereafter. The law is not clear on who gets to make that determination, however. Under state law, individuals can be hospitalized against their will for mental illness but only if they present a danger or threat to themselves or others, and only if that is the least restrictive method available. Elizabeth has not had a chance to respond. The second case was only filed Wednesday and St. In a filing in the first case, hospital lawyers denied falsifying documents and denied most of the claims, saying they couldn't determine the veracity of some of the facts. We place a high value on all our patients' health and privacy," hospital spokesman Guy Karrick said in an email. “We can’t comment on any active litigation matter, nor would we ever comment about anyone who might be or have been our patient without their express authorization. Construction is set to begin this spring and be finished by fall 2017. The initiative has already gained state approval under the state's complicated "certificate of need" regulations. Elizabeth is in the process of building a new mental health hospital along with nonprofit provider NorthKey of Covington and a for-profit company out of New Jersey. Mental health facilities are regulated by the Commonwealth, and a treatment center has to certify a need for beds with the state." Elizabeth is pushing a very liberal involuntary admission policy to coincide with the new mental health facility that St. Only after his client "had been confined against her will for a long time did an actual doctor meet with her to determine whether or not she really needed to be there in the first place," Sidebottom said. "Given, that this haphazard admission practice is not isolated to my client, there is a concern that St.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |